By
Rev. Jim Purcell, MPS, CPSP1
No American citizen who has failed to complete a tour (of three years or greater) in one of the armed forces of the United States of America should be permitted to participate in the American political process, aside from holding voting rights. There must, of course, be exceptions established for those who are disabled, but otherwise there should not be any.
Political and Governmental Office is a serious thing, too long left to unqualified hands, who were and are of the mistaken belief that education, business acumen, family connections or money alone should allow them a place at the table of power in the United States and/or any of the governments organized within the United States. In truth, no one who has failed to serve and defend their nation in its uniform is deserving, nor should be permitted, to stand for any elected office or appointment, and where it includes legal and medical posts -- they too should be exclusively filled with candidates otherwise qualified for such positions, but who have also served their nation in its uniformed services for a minimum of one tour.
Without the element of brotherhood and/or sisterhood with Americans, which is derived from military service, it has been learned in the present and past that office-holders, politicians and politicos hold their first loyalty to political parties, corrupt patrons or oft-demented personal desires. However, where it involves the vast number of veterans of the nation, their first loyalty shall always be to God, their family and this nation.
The non-veteran, regardless of governmental post held, does not understand what patriotism or citizenship in this nation truly includes and does not include.
Patriotism is surrendering one's own will to that of the Republic and the officers appointed over them by their nation. Enlistment in the U.S. military (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Coast Guard) is a leap of faith -- a physical demonstration of the inner loyalty one has to the land of their birth or naturalization. And, these people -- our service members and veterans -- are patriots; only veterans or service members, by definition, can be patriots. Someone who has not so subordinated their will to this nation (a non-veteran) is not, nor shall ever be a patriot of this Republic.
Further, for any veteran, enlisted or officer, to be qualified for elected or appointed office, they must have honorably completed a tour in the U.S. military to become eligible to hold such office in the United States, its territories or possessions. Through completing a period of honorable service in the U.S. military, discipline, faith and dedication is amply demonstrated by veterans, which is requisite for being a successful office holder.
Barring satisfaction of these standards of service no citizens, naturally born or naturalized, should be permitted to run for or place their name in nomination for elected office in the United States, its territories and possessions. In addition, to wrongfully assert one's military status as rendered or "honorably served" under this system, incarceration in a Federal prison for not less than one year and not more than two years should be established within the Federal Courts System.
This measure needs to be emplaced for the following reasons:
I. Office holders, confused over their proper loyalties, have placed party ahead of the interests of the Republic and its citizenry. And, this is disloyal and treasonous;
II. Governmental gridlock has adversely impacted the nation and states within this nation, requiring more responsible leadership than can be otherwise offered by non-veterans;
III. Political parties, of both persuasions, have each actively sought to unfairly target and/or harass specific, identifiable groups within the American Republic -- and so have betrayed the Constitution of the United States of America: Clearly, the vast majority of office-holders, holding allegiances to these parties, are unfit to hold office; and
IV. Disloyal acts, in official and unofficial capacities, by American politicians, office holders, staff appointees, boosters and contributors have warranted a formal return of the once informal precedent that elected office holders should have successfully served previously in the military. With frequency, American office-holders are routinely committing acts that could be labeled as treasonous if brought to the full-light of public attention, as it should be. Patently, non-veterans are not trustworthy, by definition, despite notable exceptions.
There are devious, unpatriotic and un-American groups operating in and around the institutions of power in this country, who will not like this standard to be established. As a result, such groups and politicians would be seeking to make war against the Constitution of the United States and its intent. Accordingly, a law-enforcement and/or military formula should be made to nullify this threat to the common good.
Make no mistake -- I am proposing an emergency measure following the collapse of our governmental processes since the late 20th century. The very nature of this collapse threatens every American community and the very fabric and stability of the American Republic. This is especially so where it involves the securement of our borders, economic interests, foreign policy, economic prosperity and national security. All of these have been left in the hands of non-patriots from political parties. These groups have attempted to make arguments to avoid the blaring fact that none of them, who has not served in the military, should be holding office right now.
Further, no non-veteran should be permitted to hold office within political parties, due to the proximity of these offices to seats of power.
Why all of this? Well, the armed forces are enormous teams, which exist only to serve this nation and its people. Servicemen and women the world over dedicate their lives to serving our nation responsibly night and day, without fail. They do not make speeches about honor -- they live honor.
There is a fundamental tenant of leadership that one cannot lead without first having followed. Further, in spite of many good office holders in the current and past who have been non-veterans, the non-veteran performing admirably in elected office without using advanced marketing to disguise their unpatriotic flaws, is rare. Non-veterans, far and away are not patriotic and do not even know what that phrase means. As a result, they are unclear about what their duties to the Republic actually are.
To prove my point, many Americans mistakenly believe espousing a certain political set of beliefs (and often bitching about it loudly) amounts to patriotism: it is not.
Former soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines are truly citizens of this nation who have proven their fidelity, patriotism and dedication in hostile environments and climates all over the world, at sea, in the air and on battlefields when summoned to them. It is the veterans of this nation who -- now and forever -- need to teach Americans what loyalty to this country is -- by serving in its halls of power at every level, as responsible guardians of our nation's stores, lands, money, resources, shores, skies and waterways.
The 'cure' to America's political issues is not allowing one political 'side' or the other to win, or even to keep on arguing; it is solved by removing these false 'patriots' from their seats and positions of power to allow for more competent, resolved leadership that will protect the Republic rather than damage it any further.
Without this kind of creativity, I cannot believe that our nation has even another century as the greatest power on earth: Does anyone believe that our way of doing government and politics will 'work' without true Americans -- veterans -- at the helm of our nation? I, for one, do not.
In Rome, the Republic was strong when its veterans ran the nation and its commerce. It was when Rome became weak by employing mercenaries and fat from its own greed that their empire fell to pieces, as ours is currently. I believe, this course of action, is the only one that will reverse our collective governmental trajectory.
(The Rev. James J. Purcell is a graduate of the New York Theological Seminary and Capital Healthcare, respectively. He is a former Sergeant who served as an Intelligence and Infantryman in the U.S. Army and its components between 1983-1998. He is also a former long-time member of the Greater Long Branch NAACP and is also a life-member of the 82nd Airborne Division Association.)
This site is about News, History, Government, Science, Commentary, Culture, Music, Poetry and Literature.
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Democrats. Show all posts
Friday, March 7, 2014
Saturday, February 1, 2014
War-Monger DC Trust Fund Babies Try to Take Social Security Away
Trust fund babies in Washington try to take our Social Security away! |
I started contributing to Social Security when I was 16 years old, with a full-time job. I didn't stop having a full-time job until I was 47, when my injuries and disorders just caught up with me. I depend on Social Security being there for now and the future. And, any soft-handed, trust fund boy or girl in elected office that tells me they are going to "change" or "end" Social Security can go straight to hell.
The politicians in this country, at all levels, take care of the wealthiest Americans, really. Wealthy people are well represented at every level of Government. Yet, it is only Social Security that rewards the hard-working men and women of this country and gives them the square deal they deserve in this life right here. The rest of that stuff the politicians babble on about on television or in their speeches is a load of crap. I hate the idea of paying for their crap, but that is something no one can stop. Still, I'd protest every damn day if I thought anyone was thinking about touching Social Security in any way whatsoever.
I hear all the time by some politicians that "...it is just impossible to keep on funding Social Security as it has been." Well, kid, let me tell you this: People contribute to Social Security all their lives -- that is what is funding it. And, people are contributing to it right now. If there is an accounting problem, maybe it has something to do with two dumbass wars you thought were a good idea for 10 years.
Everyone knows these wars were dragged out to their illogical conclusion and were for years. How much money did the Good Old USA waste and flush down a toilet in Southwestern Asia? Who the hell knows -- but if we had it back Social Security would be fine into the next century without any nonsense.
A whole lot is being done in the name of "national security" these days -- more than any other era. If I were talking to our key government leaders right now, I would tell them this: You can bug my phone if you want, my Facebook page and my e-mail and Blogger accounts. I don't care. I am a loyal American and, whatever else I have been in this life, I have been that all of my days. But, don't you think my damn Social Security check is going to pay for one damn camera for you. If you need to, U.S. Government, you get a paper route to afford that crap -- I've earned what I've earned and you can get your grimy mitts off my Social Security. For that matter, don't even look at it -- I don't want to hear the words "Social Security" from any of your lying mouths.
If you have a bright idea about saving money, you go find it somewhere else.
I recall, as a child at the Marine Military Academy, in Harlingen, Texas, a speaker on the occasion of the Marine Corps Birthday, Nov. 10, 1775, being Chief of Naval Operations, Vice Admiral Thomas V. Foley. His words have rung in my ears ever since he uttered them and they are with me today. I have not forgot something he said and it went like this: "I just got back from Russia recently, where I was in Moscow. And, I would go for a run in the morning and be followed. I would use the phone and it would be tapped. Where I lived had listening devices in them. And, I knew it was not someplace that was free. Then I returned to the United States and instantly felt the freedom of this country again. This is a place where the Government does not follow you, tap your phone lines and where someone can truly be free."
Well, that isn't so anymore is it?
America does a lot of the things the Reds used to do back in the day, as a matter of national security or whatever.
I traveled to Washington DC as a child of 7 or so with my family and it was magnificent. I could and did walk right into the Capitol Building without anyone stopping me. I stared at the ceiling until I was dizzy. Then, I ran immediately to the gift shop and wailed until my parents bought me anything from there. I think it ended up being one of the glass snow scenes of the Capitol and I was content.
Today, you might as well be visiting a sealed off encampment, braced for attack as visit Washington DC. I am not saying there is no cause for this, but I am saying that America is diminished for it, and the spying on its own people and the ridiculous, frivolous wars of 10 years. Yes, we are a great nation, but we are no longer a nation with great leaders or possessing a great people. Right now, we live in the best possible country on this earth, but it is a country not as great as it has been before. And, a lot of us think that, I am pretty sure it is not just me.
What does that have to do with Social Security? Glad you asked. It has everything to do with it, because all of this nonsense costs money. The Federal Government has to find money for all of this crap, and then they cast a wary eye at Social Security. Well, Mr. Wary Eye Looker: Go to hell! Fine, this is the world we have now, well and good. Don't drag me into your mess.
I've paid my taxes, served my country during times of peace and war, as well as my community when it was needed -- like so many of us. Well, go and play your 1984 George Orwell games all you want. Like I said, put a microphone in my morning tea if you want -- but leave my Social Security alone. I don't like the way my world has changed, and I think I am not alone in that one either. But, this is the world the young people want, the ones they allow their politicians to give them and I have far fewer years ahead of me than are behind me so this world in a political, social and business sense is no longer my affair. But, as an observer with no dog in that hunt, it full-on sucks, in case anyone didn't know.
Well, thanks for stopping by and listening to my rant. As always, best of the week and seeya later, alligators.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)